Monday, December 17, 2012
The 1918 Role Model (aka Edward Cullen) in Characterization
Our deepest apologies for a late post today. Linda Yezak and family could definitely use some jolly holiday Christmas cheer and prayers!
The 1918 Character Role Model
Hi, my name is Lisa and I’m hopelessly addicted to Too Good
To Be True characters.
That would be, in my reading life. In my author life, I know
that only international best-selling authors whose first novels hit the big
time and are turned into mega-million-dollar movies can get away with stuff
like that. Real writers must follow rules that say characters must stumble and
get up again.
So, last spring I had a weekend looming with Not Much To Do.
I happened to be at the library after my high-brow classic book club, which
meets in the DVD section BTW, and saw that a couple of movies that had been
getting a Lot of Attention were available for check out. I checked them out,
being, an author who is, of course, ever on the hunt of Why Something Worked
Really Well* for an author**, and why other Authors*** hate it (aka are
Jealous****).
I totally groaned through the movies, then learned about
borrowing books through the library for my eReader, so I (*) checked them out.
And didn’t stop reading. I still haven’t, in case you’re interested, having
discovered a way to cheat the system of having to return them, and not feeling
one bit guilty, because…well…** can afford it, for *, and because I’m ****.
What * Learned.
People who indulge in their own and other’s pop reading
habits leave snobbery to literary critics who think that only globally-shattering
events are worthy of making Junior Lit’s immortal syllabus.
In other words, readers want Harry Potter, Edward Cullen,
and Peeta Mellark. Characters who are challenged, focused, determined, and pure,
having overcome an eensy little flaw. Someone I’d trust with my daughter.
The ** of Edward Cullen.
1918 wasn’t the quintessential year of glorified Americanism.
It wasn’t even part of the Greatest Generation. It was an age of rising and
comfortable middle class, growing affluence, and the coalescence of globalism
that came out of the First World War. It was the first generation that began to
grow away from the assumption that certain members of society needed to be
protected, that honor and patriotism were more important than personal opinion,
and that dignity was the natural order of civilization.
It was the year that Edward Masen died…and was created as
Edward Cullen, a manchild newly loved unconditionally, but trapped forever between
missing his mother and waiting a few more months to enlist in the army to fight
in World War I. And here’s why the background of a character is so important.
None of those facts are going to be part of the story, but they are essential
to the makeup of the character; they are what guide his actions and reactions.
Forward this manchild who’s grown in knowledge if not empathy for nearly a
hundred years into a society of repellent mores, the opposite of what he
believes right, and you have an admirable character struggling to maintain
dignity and practice what he believes is right. It’s…attractive to readers.
Being able to do right no matter the obstacle makes him too good to be true.
But there’s enough multi-layered visionary conflict and travail to satisfy a
leap off the page.
What about the others?
Harry Potter, a young boy growing to
adulthood, was forced from infancy to constantly choose between dignity and
despair. The Hunger Games just passed the Harry Potter series in sales. Peeta,
the young man who is Katniss’s counterpart, is also a man of integrity and
chose at a young age to risk personal safety to aid others in desperate
straits.
By the time the Hunger Games came out, the *** had already
gained acclaim for an earlier work. She didn’t suffer **** as did the other **s,
who were debut authors with a formula.
The formula? Create a youthful, delicious,
exceptionally well-mannered, perfected through trial character to root for, set
up crazy odds but ensure victory, even if someone has to die and there’s blood.
Oh, and it helps if there’s a rival for the girl.
Honestly, a story arc is never going to satisfy (sell) like
the characters who ride it. It rarely matters where or when that goal-conflict-resolution
business takes place as long as root-worthy 2G2BT characters rule.
For the record,
* like character-driven works to read. I
will never understand the attraction of
***F Scott Fitzgerald or ***Irving
Wallace, have read all of Bleak House in a week, think
***Anne McCaffrey could
have taught me to knit and
will die believing that Dandelion Wine is the best
American literary work of the 20th century.
* been married a lot
longer than I haven’t—to the same guy—and raised two perfect sons who turned
out way better than I will ever be.
No daughters. But if I had one, she could
date Edward.
*I
**other Authors
***My hero authors
****dying a fate worse than death
|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)



.jpg)

Michael J. Scott specializes in action/adventure thrillers and suspense. He released four novels between 2010 and 2011, and is expecting to release twice that many in 2012. lives outside of Rochester, NY with his wife and three children..jpg)

Lisa!! I love you, dear lady. I laughed and nodded my head in agreement through this whole article. And funny thing, I didn't realize you'd written it until then end. But I should have known!! :-)
ReplyDeleteMorgan can date Edward too. hehe!
I've only read the first Hunger Games but intend to read the rest. Harry Potter I plan to read soon, too because Seth is wanting to read it and I want to give my approval first. I've heard great and awful things about it, depending on who's talking (my liberal friends or my conservative friends. wink). I intend to form my own opinion. :-)
Thanks for the fun today. And for another glimpse into your wise and insightful authorly head. :-)
Aw, sweet April - you're also too good to be true!
ReplyDeleteLisa