Friday, January 25, 2013
Now that I've had a chance to read it, I have mixed feelings about it. On the one hand, I found the concept behind the novel intriguing--this notion that the leaders of the United States have brought down judgment upon us all by their defiance of God's chastisement. Certainly the idea that 9-11 was allowed to happen to us for our sins is not new, and Jonathan Cahn does a great job in laying out the ways in which America has been paralleling the attitudes and even the actions of the ancient Israelites in their response to the assault of the Assyrians. On this count alone, the book is worth reading.
On the other hand, however, this book represents to me the worst kind of Christian fiction, because it isn't really a novel. It's more akin to a parable. The story is preachy. The narrative lacks any distinctive style. The characters lack development or depth (or even a description!). The book reveals nothing about the human condition, other than the interpretation of recent events in light of scripture. In many ways, it is the antithesis of what I personally believe Christian fiction should represent - ie: the best in story-telling.
I have no objection to communicating a biblical message of one kind or another in the midst of a novel, but it cannot come at the expense of the essential elements of a story: setting, characterization, plot, description, conflict, etc., and I think The Harbinger fails on this account.
A better example of a Christian message encapsulated in a novel, in my opinion, is C.S. Lewis' That Hideous Strength, or even the first two books of the Space Trilogy. I pick out the third book because a) it is my favorite, and b) because in this book, a deeply theological and cultural critique is offered, but none of it at the expense of the story. To me, this is what Christian writers ought to aspire to.
And yet for all that, I still enjoyed The Harbinger, found it's message interesting, and wouldn't hesitate to recommend it to a friend. But just not as a great novel.